Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| MO-2771
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
MO-2771
Document
MO-2771
/ifq?>
File #
MA10-361
Institution/HIC
City of Vaughan
Summary
The appellant sought certain records from 2006 and 2007 relating to the cellular/blackberry invoices from two telephone companies for two individuals (the former mayor and a former employee of the mayor’s office). The city located some responsive records and provided partial access to them, denying access to portions of them on the basis of section 14(1) (personal privacy). The city also stated that some of the responsive records were not in its custody or control. The appellant appealed the city’s decision, and also claimed that additional records should exist, raising concerns about the adequacy of the city’s search. This order determines that information about the locations to which calls were made or received is not personal information and ought to be disclosed, but that the telephone numbers of individuals contacting the mayor’s office is the personal information of those individuals. This order also determines that some of the searches conducted for records were not reasonable, and orders further searches to be conducted. In addition, it determines that the city has control of the former mayor’s detailed invoices, and the city is ordered to obtain copies of the invoices and issue an access decision.
Legislation
MFIPPA
Section 17
2(1) personal information
14(2)(h)
4(1)
4(2)
Subject Index
of mayor
Signed by
Frank DeVries
Published
Jul 30, 2012
Type
Order
Orders and Reports Considered
P-120
P-239
MO-2750
Cases Considered
Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of National Defence) (Minister of National Defence),
2011 SCC 25.
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")