Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| MO-2772-F
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
MO-2772-F
Document
MO-2772-F
/ifq?>
File #
MA11-350
Institution/HIC
Town of Amherstburg
Summary
The appellant sought access to a sponsorship agreement between the town and a named company or individual. The town denied access to the agreement as a whole, relying on the mandatory exemption in section 10(1) (third party information), as well as the discretionary exemption in section 11 (economic interests of an institution). An affected party, the company, did not object to disclosure of the agreement, with the exception of one section. This order decides that these exemptions do not apply and directs disclosure of the agreement.
Legislation
MFIPPA
10(1)
Section 11
Signed by
Sherry Liang
Published
Jul 31, 2012
Type
Order – Final
Orders and Reports Considered
PO-1805
PO-2018
PO-2184
MO-1706
PO-2371
PO-2384
PO-2435
PO-2497
MO-1947
MO-2363
PO-2758
Cases Considered
Boeing Co. v. Ontario (Ministry of Economic Development and Trade)
, [2005] O.J. No. 2851 (Div. Ct.),
Ontario (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner)
(1998), 41 O.R. (3d) 464 (C.A.).
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")