Document

MO-2772-F

File #  MA11-350
Institution/HIC  Town of Amherstburg
Summary  The appellant sought access to a sponsorship agreement between the town and a named company or individual. The town denied access to the agreement as a whole, relying on the mandatory exemption in section 10(1) (third party information), as well as the discretionary exemption in section 11 (economic interests of an institution). An affected party, the company, did not object to disclosure of the agreement, with the exception of one section. This order decides that these exemptions do not apply and directs disclosure of the agreement.
Legislation
  • MFIPPA
  • 10(1)
  • Section 11
Signed by  Sherry Liang
Published  Jul 31, 2012
Type  Order – Final
Orders and Reports Considered  PO-1805   PO-2018   PO-2184   MO-1706   PO-2371   PO-2384   PO-2435   PO-2497   MO-1947   MO-2363   PO-2758  
Cases Considered  Boeing Co. v. Ontario (Ministry of Economic Development and Trade), [2005] O.J. No. 2851 (Div. Ct.), Ontario (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner) (1998), 41 O.R. (3d) 464 (C.A.).
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")