Document

M-1159

Institution/HIC  Toronto Police Services Board
Summary  NATURE OF THE APPEAL: The Toronto Police Services Board (the Police) received a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy (the Act ) from one of its employees for access to the notebooks of two named police officers for Tuesday, April 15, 1997. The Police informed the requester that one of the police officers did not keep a notebook for this date and therefore such a record does not exist. The Police denied access to the other police officer's notebook entries, consisting of eight pages, pursuant to section 52(3)1 and 3 of the Act . These notebook entries relate to events leading to the requester's suspension from duty as a uniformed member of the police force. As such, the Police determined that the notes were employment-related records and fell outside the scope of the Act . The requester, now the appellant, appealed the decision of the Police. A Notice of Inquiry was sent to the Police and to the appellant. Representations were received from the Police only. After issuing the Notice of Inquiry, this Office released a number of orders dealing with the interpretation of section 52(3) and its provincial counterpart. Because these orders could have an impact on the present appeal, both parties were sent a Supplementary Notice of Inquiry and provided with an opportunity to make further representations. Additional representations were received from the Police. DISCUSSION: JURISDICTION The sole issue to be determined in this appeal is whether the requested information falls within the scope of sections 52(3) and section 52(4) of the Act . These provisions read, in part, as follows: (3) Subject to subsection (4), this Act does not apply to records collected, prepared, maintained or used by or on behalf of an institution in relation to any of the following: 1. Proceedings or anticipated proceedings before a court, tribunal or other entity relating to labour relations or to the employment of a person by the institution. ... 3. Meetings, consultations, discussions or communications about labour relations or employment-related matters in which the institution has an interest. (4) This Act applies to the following records: 1. An agreement between an institution and a trade union. 2. An agreement between an institution and one or more employees which ends a proceeding before a court, tribunal or other entity relating to labour relations or to employment-related matters. 3. An agreement between an institution and one or more employees resulting from negotiations about employment- related matters between the institution and the employee or employees. 4. An expense account submitted by an employee of an institution to that institution for the purpose of seeking reimbursement for expenses incurred by the employee in his or her employment. The interpretation of sections 52(3) and (4) is a preliminary issue which goes to the Commissioner's jurisdiction to continue an inquiry. Section 52(3) is record-specific and fact-specific. If this section applies to a specific record, in the circumstances of a particular appeal, and none of the exceptions listed in section 52(4) are present, then the record is excluded from the scope of the Act and not subject to the Commissioner's jurisdiction. The Police claim that both sections 52(3)1 and 52(3)3 apply. Section 52(3)1 The Police state that allegations of misconduct had been made against the appellant. The Police submit that the Police Services Act (the PSA ) imposes an obligation on the Chief of Police to investigate any apparent or alleged misconduct. According to the Police, the records at issue in this appeal relate to such an investigation, which resulted in criminal charges. In order for a record to fall within the scope of paragraph 1 of section 52(3) of the Act , the Police must establish that: 1. the record was collected, prepared, maintained or used by the Police or on its behalf; and 2. this collection, preparation, maintenance or usage was in relation to proceedings or anticipated proceedings before a court, tribunal or other entity; and 3. these proceedings or anticipated proceedings relate to labour relations or to the employment of a person by the Police. Requirement 1 I have examined the records and I am satisfied that they were collected, prepared, maintained and/or used by the Police as part of its investigation. Therefore, the first requirement has been established. Requirements 2 and 3 The Police state that, pursuant to the PSA , criminal complaints against a police officer may result in a hearing, and if a finding of misconduct results, certain penalties may be imposed, including dismissal, demotion, suspension and/or the forfeiture of pay and accrued time. The Police submit that the requested records were prepared in anticipation of the appellant being subject to such a hearing under the PSA . In Order M-835, I made the following findings: A disciplinary hearing conducted under section 60 of the PSA is a dispute or complaint resolution process conducted by a court, tribunal or other entity which has, by law, the power to decide disciplinary matters. As such, these hearings are properly characterized as "proceedings" for the purpose of section 52(3)1. The Chief of Police or delegate has the authority to conduct "proceedings", and the power, by law, to determine matters affecting legal rights and obligations, and is properly characterized as an "other entity" for the purposes of section 52(3)1. Proceedings under Part V of the PSA which deal with internal complaints "relate to the employment of a person by the institution". I have reached the same conclusions in the present appeal. I find that the notebook entries were collected, prepared, maintained and/or used by the Police as part of its investigation into the conduct of the appellant, with a view towards an anticipated disciplinary hearing under section 60 of the PSA . As such, they are
Legislation
  • MFIPPA
  • 52(3)1
Subject Index
Published  Nov 05, 1998
Type  Order
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")