|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
I93-079M
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institution/HIC
|
|
INVESTIGATION REPORT INVESTIGATION I93-079M A MUNICIPALITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
INTRODUCTION Background of the Complaint This investigation was initiated as a result of a complaint concerning the Community Services Department of a Municipality (the Municipality). The complainant, a day care operator, wished to enter into a purchase of service agreement with the Municipality. He was required to provide certain information to the Municipality. The complainant was concerned that the collection of this information was contrary to Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act ). Collection 1: The complainant was required to fill out a "Budget Submission For Purchase of Service Agreement" package. The prescribed forms dictated that the complainant provide information relating to himself and to all staff members of his day care operation and their projected salaries. The complainant was concerned with the collection of this information. One of the forms in the package categorized staff by position. The complainant maintained that since he was the only person who was employed as a supervisor, he was clearly identifiable. Collection 2: The complainant wished to employ an individual at his day care centre who did not have the requisite qualifications under the Day Nurseries Act . Accordingly, the complainant made an application to the Ministry of Community and Social Services, for a provincial provisionally trained exemption under the Day Nurseries Act , on behalf of the individual. Day care operators involved in purchase of service agreements with the Municipality must, according to the Municipality's Operating Criteria, submit an application for a municipal provisionally trained exemption as well. The Municipality required several supplementary documents to be filed with the application which would be taken into consideration in determining whether to approve the application. The complainant was concerned that the collection of some of the supplementary documentation was contrary to the Act . Issues Arising from the Investigation The following issues were identified as arising from the investigation: (A) Was the information in question "personal information" as defined in section 2(1) of the Act ? If yes, (B) Was the Municipality's collection of the personal information in accordance with section 28(2) of the Act ? RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION Issue A: Was the information in question "personal information" as defined in section 2(1) of the Act ? Section 2(1) of the Act states, in part: "personal information" means recorded information about an identifiable individual, including, (b) information relating to the education or the medical, psychiatric, psychological, criminal or employment history of the individual or information relating to financial transactions in which the individual has been involved, (h) the individual's name if it appears with other personal information relating to the individual or where the disclosure of the name would reveal other personal information about the individual; Collection 1: The Budget Submission For Purchase of Service Agreement contained staff members' names, positions held; actual annual salary paid to the position the previous year without a grant contribution; and the annual salary estimated for the position without a grant contribution, for the applicable year. In our view, this information met the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (h) of the definition of "personal information", in section 2(1) of the Act . Collection 2: The application for a provisionally trained exemption required the submission of the provincial approval letter, the advertisement of vacancy or receipts from advertisements, the individual's diploma, a transcript of courses, a letter from an educational institution confirming outstanding courses and/or practicums, a letter of intent from a staff member, and A.E.C.E.O. Exam confirmation/results. Of the required information, the complainant provided the provincial approval letter, the individual's diploma, and a transcript of the individual's courses. In our view, this information met the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (h) of the definition of "personal information", in section 2(1) of the Act . Conclusion: The information in question was personal information as defined in section 2(1) of the Act . Issue B: Was the Municipality's collection of the personal information in accordance with section 28(2) of the Act ? Section 28(2) states: No person shall collect personal information on behalf of an institution unless the collection is expressly authorized by statute, used for the purposes of law enforcement or necessary to the proper administration of a lawfully authorized activity . (emphasis added) The Municipality stated that, at its discretion, it may provide for the establishment of day nurseries. It may also enter into agreements with day care operators for nursery services, and may make expenditures as are necessary for those services. The Municipality indicated that these activities are authorized by section 3 of the Day Nurseries Act . Section 3 of the Day Nurseries Act states: (1) The council of a municipality may, subject to this Act and the regulations, by by-law provide for the establishment of day nurseries. (2) The council of a municipality may pass by-laws granting aid to day nurseries. (3) The council of a municipality may subject to this Act and the regulations, enter into an agreement with the operator of a day nursery for the furnishing of day nursery services for such children as is agreed upon, and the municipality may make expenditures as are necessary for the purpose. In our view, the Municipality's establishment of day nurseries, the purchase of nursery services from day nursery operators and the making of expenditures necessary for this purpose, are lawfully authorized activities. The Municipality advised that in order to administer day nurseries and the purchase of service agreements, as well as determine the necessary expenditures for this purpose, an operating criteria was established. This criteria sets out municipal standards in accordance with the Day Nurseries Act and its regulations. Collection 1: The Municipality advised that it must determine the expenditures that are necessary for the purchase of services from day nursery operators who are a party to a purchase of service agreement. In order to do this, the day nursery operators must file a detailed budget submission. The budget submission package requires the day nursery operator to include the names of all day nursery staff, their positions held, and their projected salaries. The Municipality stated that it has a responsibility to verify that any funds provided are used for the purposes intended. The Municipality stated that a significant percentage of the funding given in a purchase for service agreement is determined by salary expenditures. In accordance with the operating criteria, the total salaries for specified positions can not exceed salaries paid to the municipally operated day nurseries' staff. To ensure the claimed costs have been incurred and the identified individuals have received the appropriate compensation, employee T4 slips are compared wit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
-
MFIPPA
-
2(1) personal information (b)
-
2(1) personal information (h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published
|
|
May 17, 1994
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Privacy Complaint Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<
Back
|
|
|
|
Back to Top
|
 |
|
|
|
© Copyright
2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
|