|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
M-77
|
|
|
/ifq?>
|
File #
|
|
M-9200210
|
|
|
|
Institution/HIC
|
|
The Corporation of the Township of Maidstone
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
The Corporation of the Township of Maidstone (the Township) received a request under the
Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act) for a copy of a report
prepared by a named consulting firm relating to the Township's staffing systems. The Township
identified the record as a 15-page report entitled "Township of Maidstone Staffing Systems
Review", dated March 24, 1992. The Township denied access to the record in its entirety,
claiming section 11(f) of the Act. The requester appealed the Township's decision.
In the course of processing the appeal, the Appeals Officer identified that certain information
contained in the record constituted the personal information of identifiable individuals. The
appellant indicated to the Appeals Officer that she was not interested in such information.
Therefore, the personal information contained in the record is not at issue in this appeal and
should not be disclosed.
Because complete settlement of the appeal through mediation was not possible, the matter
proceeded to inquiry, and a Notice of Inquiry was sent to the appellant, the Township, and the
named consultant. Written representations were received from the Township only.
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed by
|
|
Asfaw Seife
|
|
|
|
Published
|
|
Jan 21, 1993
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Order
|
|
|
|
Judicial Review
|
|
Institution's application dismissed January 10, 1994
Maidstone (Township) v. Starzacher, London Doc. 796972 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
Divisional Court Decision
|
|
|
|
<<
Back
|
|
|
|
Back to Top
|
 |
|
|
© Copyright
2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
|