|
Summary
|
|
On June 30, 2005, I issued Order MO-1939 in which I reviewed a decision of the London Police Services Board (the Police) to deny access to a large number of records that were responsive to a request made under the access to information provisions of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act). In that Order, I upheld the decision of the Police to deny access to the majority of the responsive records. However, I did not uphold the decision of the Police to deny access to some of the records and, in Order Provision 1 of Order MO-1939, I stated:
I order the Police to disclose Records 36, 526, 535, 638 to 648, 649 to 655, 664 to 669, 670 to 675, 695 to 702, 717 to 725, 726 to 728, 729 to 733, 1585, 1587, 1588 to 1595, 1625 and 1626 to 1631 to the appellant by providing him with a copy by August 8, 2005 but not before August 2, 2005.
Prior to the date for compliance with the order, the Police requested that I reconsider my decision in Order MO-1939. The Police argued that there was a fundamental defect in the adjudication process followed as I failed to consider the possible application of the mandatory exemption in section 9(1)(d) of the Act to some of the records which I ordered disclosed.
|