Document

MO-1868-R

File #  MA-040061-1
Institution/HIC  Durham Regional Police Service
Summary

This order sets out my decision on the reconsideration of Order PO-1855, issued on October15,2004.

The appellant submitted a request to the Durham Regional Police Service (the Police), under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act), for access to all driver and witness statements relating to a fatal motor vehicle accident. The requester also asked whether the Police had possession of any other information or documentation about the accident in addition to the various statements.

The request was submitted by a law firm on behalf of the insurer of the driver of one of the vehicles (the driver). For reasons outlined in Order MO-1855, I treated the law firm and the driver as interchangeable for the purposes of the appeal.

The Police identified 11 driver and witness statements as the records responsive to the request, one of which was the videotaped statement of the driver. The Police denied access to all of these records in their entirety, pursuant to the exemptions in section 8(2)(a) (law enforcement) and section 14(1) (invasion of privacy) of the Act. The Police relied on the presumptions in sections 14(3)(a) and 14(3)(b) and the factor in section 14(2)(f) in support of the section 14(1) claim. The appellant appealed the Ministry’s decision.

Legislation
  • 8(2)(a)
  • 14(1)(a)
  • 14(1)(f)
  • 14(3)(a)
  • 14(3)(b)
  • 14(2)(f)
  • MFIPPA
Subject Index
Signed by  Tom Mitchinson
Published  Nov 19, 2004
Type  Reconsideration Order
Orders and Reports Considered  MO-1855  
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")