This order sets out my decision on the reconsideration of Order PO-1855, issued on October15,2004.
The appellant submitted a request to the Durham Regional Police Service (the Police), under the
The request was submitted by a law firm on behalf of the insurer of the driver of one of the vehicles (the driver). For reasons outlined in Order MO-1855, I treated the law firm and the driver as interchangeable for the purposes of the appeal.
The Police identified 11 driver and witness statements as the records responsive to the request, one of which was the videotaped statement of the driver. The Police denied access to all of these records in their entirety, pursuant to the exemptions in section 8(2)(a) (law enforcement) and section 14(1) (invasion of privacy) of the