Document

MO-2294

File #  MA-040339-1 and MA-040386-1
Institution/HIC  City of Waterloo
Summary
  • Bills for legal services related to the RIM Park and a number of named individuals
  • Section 52(3)1 - labour relations and employment records - not upheld
  • Section 7(1) - advice or recommendations - not upheld
  • Sections 11(c) and (d) - economic and other interests - not upheld
  • Section 12 - solicitor-client privilege - not upheld
  • Records at issue ordered to be disclosed to the appellant
Legislation
  • MFIPPA
  • Section 12
  • 11(c)
  • 11(d)
  • 7(1)
Signed by  Laurel Cropley
Published  Apr 17, 2008
Type  Order
Orders and Reports Considered  PO-2483   PO-2484  
Issue Outcomes
  • Bills for legal services related to the RIM Park and a number of named individuals
  • Section 52(3)1 - labour relations and employment records - not upheld
  • Section 7(1) - advice or recommendations - not upheld
  • Sections 11(c) and (d) - economic and other interests - not upheld
  • Section 12 - solicitor-client privilege - not upheld
  • Records at issue ordered to be disclosed to the appellant
Judicial Review  Institution's application dismissed November 25, 2010
Corporation of the City of Waterloo v. Cropley and Higgins, 2010 ONSC 6522, [2010] O.J. No. 5380 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")