Document

MO-2678

File #  MA09-441
Institution/HIC  Waterloo Regional Police Services Board
Summary  The appellant sought access to all police records relating to a break-in at an identified school on a specified date. The police initially denied access to the records, though they subsequently granted partial access to them. The appellant filed an appeal, seeking access to the withheld records. During the mediation of the appeal, the appellant advised that he was no longer seeking access to those portions of the records which were denied access. The appellant appealed on the basis that further records exist. He also sought access to the film used in the investigation to lift a fingerprint from the school premises if it exists. Consequently, the remaining issues in this inquiry were whether the film that lifts a fingerprint is considered to be a responsive record and whether the police conducted a reasonable search. In this order, the adjudicator concluded that the film that lifts a fingerprint is a responsive record. In addition, the police’s search is not found to be reasonable. The police are ordered to conduct a further search for fingerprint film(s) and to issue a decision letter to the appellant following the search.
Legislation
  • MFIPPA
  • Section 17
  • 2(1) record
Signed by  Cathy Hamilton
Published  Dec 20, 2011
Type  Order
Orders and Reports Considered  M-937   MO-1390   MO-1943   P-880   P-1551  
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")