Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| PO-3034
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
PO-3034
Document
PO-3034
/ifq?>
File #
PA11-23
Institution/HIC
Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario
Summary
The appellants sought access to a copy of a report. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) denied access pursuant to the third party commercial information exemption at section 17(1), section 49(a) in conjunction with the law enforcement report exemption at section 14(2)(a) and the personal privacy exemption at section 49(b). In the course of adjudication the AGCO advised that it was no longer relying on section 17(1) to withhold the responsive record. Section 49(a) in conjunction with section 14(2)(a) does not apply because the report is a “routine inspection report” thereby falling under the exception at section 14(4). The AGCO is ordered to disclose to the appellants the information in the record that relates to a company, falls within the scope of section 2(3) or qualifies as the personal information of either, or both, of the individual appellants. The balance of the personal information in the record is exempt under section 49(b).
Legislation
FIPPA
14(2)(a)
14(4)
17(1)
2(1)
2(3)
21(2)(d)
21(2)(h)
21(3)(b)
21(3)(f)
49(a)
49(b)
Signed by
Steve Faughnan
Published
Jan 11, 2012
Type
Order
Orders and Reports Considered
P-136
PO-1988
Judicial Review
Institution's application pending
Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario v. Information and Privacy Commissioner, Miratel Solutions Inc., and John Doe and Jane Doe, Requesters
, Toronto Doc. 58/12 (Div. Ct.)
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")