Document

PO-3036

File #  PA10-248
Institution/HIC  Ministry of Children and Youth Services
Summary  The appellant made a request to the ministry for the number of approved hours for each client receiving intensive behavioural intervention under the autism intervention program, broken down by region. The ministry did not provide a decision respecting access to this information as it takes the position that it does not have custody or control of the requested information for the purposes of section 10(1) of the Act. The ministry has control over the records as it does not have an arm’s length relationship with the transfer payment agencies that administer and deliver the program. The ministry is ordered to provide an access decision to the appellant.
Legislation
  • FIPPA
  • 10(1)
Signed by  Stephanie Haly
Published  Jan 16, 2012
Type  Order
Orders and Reports Considered  MO-2416  
Cases Considered  Walmsley v. Ontario (Attorney General) (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 611; Ontario (Criminal Code Review Board) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1999] O.J. No. 4072.
<< Back
Back to Top
25 Years of Access and Privacy
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")