|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
MO-2660
|
|
|
|
|
|
File #
|
|
MA10-234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institution/HIC
|
|
City of Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
The appellant sought access to the consultant’s report on response times prepared for Toronto Fire Service. The city denied access to portions of the record. Access to three pages of the record was denied under sections 10(1) (third party information) and 11 (economic and other interests). Access was denied to the remaining portions under the exclusionary provision in section 52(3)3 (employment and labour relations) of the Act. In this order, neither the exclusion in section 52(3)3 nor the exemptions in sections 10(1)(b) and 11(g) applied and the information at issue was ordered to be disclosed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
-
MFIPPA
-
Section 42
-
10(1)(b)
-
11(g)
-
52(3)3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed by
|
|
Diane Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published
|
|
Oct 24, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orders and Reports Considered
|
|
MO-1690
MO-2332
MO-2455
PO-2507
PO-2928
PO-2913
PO-2157
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases Considered
|
|
Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311, Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star, 2010 ONSC 991 (Div. Ct.), Cecilio v. Tarion Warranty Corp., [2007] O.J. No. 1692 (Div. Ct.), Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services) v. Goodis, (2008), 89 O.R. (3d) 457, [2008] O.J. No. 289 (Div. Ct.), Reynolds v. Binstock, 2006 CanLII 36624 (Div. Ct.).
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<
Back
|
|
|
|
Back to Top
|
 |
|
|
|
© Copyright
2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
|