Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| PO-3134
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
PO-3134
Document
PO-3134
File #
PA08-97-2
Institution/HIC
University of Ottawa
Summary
The appellant sought access to all records held by the University of Ottawa relating to the Ottawa Cinema Politica film series, dating from October 30, 2006. The university denied access to some of the responsive records pursuant to the exclusionary provision in section 65(6) (labour relations), and the discretionary exemptions in section 49(a) (discretion to withhold a requester’s own information), read in conjunction with section 19 (solicitor-client privilege), and section 49(b) (personal privacy). The appellant claimed that the university’s search for records was not reasonable. This order upholds the university’s search and access decision.
Legislation
FIPPA
Section 19
2(1) personal information
Section 24
49(a)
49(b)
65(6)
Signed by
Catherine Corban
Published
Nov 27, 2012
Type
Order
Orders and Reports Considered
M-909
Cases Considered
Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services) v. Goodis
(2008), 89 O.R. (3d) 457 (Div. Ct.).
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.