Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| PO-3139
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
PO-3139
Document
PO-3139
/ifq?>
File #
PA08-159-2
Institution/HIC
University of Ottawa
Summary
The appellant sought access to all records held by the University of Ottawa relating to him that were sent or received by the President of the university since November 30, 2006. The university granted partial access to 480 pages of records and denied access to a significant number of other records, pursuant to the exclusionary provision in section 65(6) (labour relations), and the discretionary exemptions in section 49(a), read in conjunction with section 19 (solicitor-client privilege) and 49(b) (personal privacy). The reasonableness of the university’s search was also at issue, as well as the responsiveness of some of the records. Finally, the fee charged by the university for the records disclosed to the appellant was in dispute. This order upholds the university’s search and access decision. This order does not uphold the university’s decision to charge for search and preparation time of the responsive records and orders it to refund the appellant any search and preparation fees already paid.
Legislation
FIPPA
Section 19
2(1) personal information
Section 24
49(a)
49(b)
65(6)
Signed by
Catherine Corban
Published
Nov 27, 2012
Type
Order
Orders and Reports Considered
M-909
Cases Considered
Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services) v. Goodis
(2008), 89 O.R. (3d) 457 (Div Ct.).
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")