Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| PO-3147
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
PO-3147
Document
PO-3147
File #
PA11-573-2
Institution/HIC
Hydro One
Summary
The appellants made a request to Hydro One for records relating to their property. Hydro One granted access to a number of records, but denied access to certain email strings and a File Progression Log Sheet under section 49(a) (discretion to refuse requester’s own information) in conjunction with section 19(a) (solicitor-client privilege). The withheld information qualifies for exemption under these sections, and Hydro One’s decision is upheld.
Legislation
2(1)
19(a)
49(a)
Signed by
Frank DeVries
Published
Dec 14, 2012
Type
Order
Cases Considered
Descôteaux v. Mierzwinski
(1982), 141 D.L.R. (3d) 590 (S.C.C.)
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.