|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
PO-3148
|
|
|
|
|
|
File #
|
|
PA10-106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institution/HIC
|
|
Ontario Power Authority
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
This order addresses the appeal from the decision of the Ontario Power Authority (the OPA) responding to a community organization’s request for access to information relating to a new power generation facility in northern York Region. The OPA denied access to bid evaluation team and scoring records variously under sections 14(1)(e), 17(1)(a) & (c), 18(1)(c) & (d), and 21(1). This appeal was placed on hold pending the outcome of reconsideration requests in Appeal PA09-413, a related appeal with several records in common. In this order, the adjudicator finds that the appellant is qualified to bring an appeal to this office under section 50(1) of the Act; that some information is not responsive to the request; and that none of the claimed exemptions apply to the records. The adjudicator is not required to consider the OPA’s exercise of discretion under sections 14 or 18, or the application of the public interest override in section 23. The responsive portions of the records are ordered disclosed to the appellant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
-
Section 1
-
2(1) personal information
-
2(3)
-
10(1)
-
14(1)(e)
-
17(1)(a)
-
17(1)(c)
-
18(1)(c)
-
18(1)(d)
-
21(1)
-
28(1)
-
50(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed by
|
|
Daphne Loukidelis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published
|
|
Dec 19, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orders and Reports Considered
|
|
PO-2987
PO-3062-R
PO-3055
PO-2917
PO-2758
PO-2657
PO-1983
PO-1816
PO-1747
PO-1745
MO-1360-I
MO-2063
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases Considered
|
|
London Property Management Association v. City of London, 2011 ONSC 4710 (Div. Ct.); Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. Ontario (Big Canoe) (1999), 46 O.R. (3d) 395 (C.A.); Ontario (Ministry of Transportation) v. Cropley (2005), 34 Admin. L.R. (4th) 12 (C.A.).
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<
Back
|
|
|
|
Back to Top
|
 |
|
|
|
© Copyright
2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
|