|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
MO-2824
|
|
|
|
|
|
File #
|
|
MA11-151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institution/HIC
|
|
City of Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
The city received a request for access to information, including correspondence and memos, relating to two registered lobbyists and a named councillor. The city took the position that these records are not in its custody or under its control and are, therefore, not subject to the Act. In this case, the adjudicator decided that the records, if they exist, are not in the custody or control of the city and are not subject to the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation
|
|
-
MFIPPA
-
2(1) institution
-
4(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed by
|
|
Frank DeVries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Published
|
|
Dec 28, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orders and Reports Considered
|
|
M-813
MO-2821
MC10-75 and MC11-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cases Considered
|
|
St. Elizabeth Home Society v. Hamilton (City) (2005), 148 A.C.W.S. (3d) 497 (Ont. Sup. Ct.), Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Minister of National Defence), 2011 SCC 25, [2011] 2 SCR 306; City of Ottawa v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2010 ONSC 6835, [2010] 328 D.L.R. (4th) 171 (Div. Ct.); leave to appeal denied (C.A. M39605).
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<
Back
|
|
|
|
Back to Top
|
 |
|
|
|
© Copyright
2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
|