Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| MO-2828-F
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
MO-2828-F
Document
MO-2828-F
/ifq?>
File #
MA11-451
Institution/HIC
City of Thunder Bay
Summary
In Order MO-2804-I, the adjudicator found that records relating to the settlement of a threatened lawsuit brought against it by the proponent of a wind farm development were exempt under section 12 (solicitor-client privilege) on the basis that they were subject to settlement privilege. The city was ordered to re-exercise its discretion and advise the appellant and this office of the result. The city denied access to the records. In this decision, the city’s exercise of discretion to deny access on the basis that they are exempt under section 12 is upheld.
Legislation
MFIPPA
Section 12
Signed by
Donald Hale
Published
Jan 14, 2013
Type
Order – Final
Orders and Reports Considered
MO-2804-I
P-58
Cases Considered
Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. Criminal Lawyers’ Association
2010 SCC 23;
Liquor Control Board of Ontario v. Magnotta Wineries Corporation
, 2010 ONCA 681.
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")