Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
IPC Search
Google
Order/Report No.
Main Menu
> For the Public
Access Personal Information
Your Privacy Rights
Privacy Complaints
Protecting Your Privacy
> For Professional
Collecting Personal Information
Using Personal Information
Accessing Information
Disclosing Information
Retaining and Disposing Information
Stop. Think. Protect.
Toolkit
Privacy Emergency Kit
> Privacy by Design
Introduction to PbD
> Stop Bullying... by Design
Stop Bullying... by Design
What is Bullying
What To Do
Online Safety
Resources
> For the Public
Accessing Public Information
Accessing Personal Information
Complaints
Correction
Appeals
> For Professional
Openness with Information
Appeals
Toolkit
> Access by Design
Introduction to AbD
AbD in Action
Individual Ambassadors
Organizational Ambassadors
Right to Know
> Hospitals under FOI
For the Public
For Hospital Staff
Annual Reports
Best Practices and Professional Guidelines
Discussion Papers
Educational Material
Events
Forms
IPC Corporate
Legislation
Links
News Releases
Newsletters
Presentations and Speeches
Reports and Submissions
Browse All Decisions & Resolutions
Subject Index listing
Advanced Findings Search
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
About the Commissioner
Role and Mandate of the IPC Office
IPC Customer Service Standard
IPC Procedures
Annual Report
Newsletters
News Releases
Educational Resources
How to Reach Us
What's New
Home
|
Decisions and Resolutions
| MO-2829
E-mail
|
Print
|
Accessibility
|
Share:
|
Subject Index Listing
Reconsideration Table
Judicial Review of Municipal Orders
Judicial Review of Provincial Orders
Judicial Review of Privacy Complaint Reports
The Acts
Recent Orders
MO-2829
Document
MO-2829
File #
MA12-202
Institution/HIC
City of Toronto
Summary
The city received a request for information relating to a cheque paid by the city to a specific law firm. The city granted the appellant with access to the records it decided were responsive to the request. The appellant sought access to further records. This order upholds the city’s decision that it had provided the appellant with the records responsive to her request and does not require the city to create a record to respond to the request. The city’s search for responsive records is also upheld as reasonable.
Legislation
MFIPPA
17(1)
2(1) record
Signed by
Diane Smith
Published
Jan 15, 2013
Type
Order
<< Back
Back to Top
Privacy
|
Access to Information
|
Resources
|
Decisions & Resolutions
|
About Us
Français
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
|
Advanced Search
|
RSS
|
Accessibility
|
Twitter Policy
|
Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2013
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.
To search for a specific word or phrase, use quotation marks around each search term. (Example: "smart meter")
Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. All Rights Reserved.