|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disponible en anglais seulement
|
No de dossier
|
|
PA-040327-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texte de loi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signé
|
|
Brian Beamish
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publié
|
|
Dec 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Reconsideration Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordonnances connexes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Résultats
|
|
- Police Officers' notes claimed to relate to conversations between the Police and Crown counsel. Parts of these records were found to be exempt under section 19 (solicitor-client privilege) upon reconsideration.
- Police Officers’ investigative notes that were copied and found their way into the Crown brief were also at issue. The finding that section 19 did not apply was affirmed on reconsideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Review
|
|
Institution’s application dismissed March 6, 2009
Institution’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal dismissed June 29, 2009
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2009] O.J. No. 952 (Div. Ct.); motion for leave to appeal dismissed, Doc. M37397 (C.A.)
Divisional Court Decision
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<
Retour
|
|
|
|
Haut de page
|
 |
|
|
|
© Copyright
2013Commissaire à l’information et à la protection
de la vie privée/Ontario. Tous droits réservés.
|