Judicial Review of Provincial Orders

 
Order No. Status Citation
PO-3740 Requester’s application pending Lyne Brassard v. Carleton University and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Ottawa Doc. DC-17-2309 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3691 Requester’s application pending Williams and Price v. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Tor. Doc. 200/17 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3686 Requester’s application pending Denis Rancourt v. University of Ottawa, Ottawa Doc. 17-2279 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3663 Affected party’s application pending Gartner Inc. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Treasury Board Secretariat and Jane Doe, Requester, Tor. Doc. 559/16 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3620 Institution’s application abandoned on May 3, 2017 Lambton College of Applied Arts and Technology v. Information and Privacy Commissioner (Ontario), Tor. Doc. 349/16 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3617 Affected parties’ applications dismissed on June 30, 2017 Ontario Medical Association v. Information and Privacy Commissioner for Ontario, the Honourable Eric Hoskins, Minister of Health and Long-term Care, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Theresa Boyle,Tor. Doc. 305/16 (Div. Ct.)
&
Several Physicians affected directly by the Order v.  Information and Privacy Commissioner for Ontario, the Honourable Eric Hoskins, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Theresa Boyle, Tor. Doc. 306/16 (Div. Ct.)
&
Affected Third Party Doctors v. Theresa Boyle (Requestor), Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, the Honourable Eric Hoskins Minister of Health and Long-Term Care (Respondent Head), Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (Institution),
Tor. Doc. 312/16 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3576 Institution’s application pending Carleton University v. Information and Privacy Commissioner and John Doe, Requestor, Ottawa Doc.16-2207 (Div. Ct.)
PO-3598 Affected party’s application dismissed on March 17, 2017 The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Ryerson University, John Doe Requestor and the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2017 ONSC 1507 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.), motion for leave to appeal dismissed June 14, 2017 (C.A. M47677)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3520 Institution’s application dismissed on February 2, 2017 Children’s Lawyer for Ontario v. Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario and the Ministry of the Attorney General for Ontario, and John Doe, Requester, 2017 ONSC 642 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.), motion for leave to appeal granted May 12, 2017 (C.A. M47541)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3514 Institution’s application dismissed on November 15, 2016 Ministry of the Attorney General v. Information and Privacy Commissioner and Marcus McCann, 2016 ONSC 6913 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3472 Affected parties’ applications allowed on August 22, 2016 Trustees of the Bricklayers and Stonemasons Union Local 2 Ontario Pension Plan v. Information and Privacy Commissioner, The Minister of Finance, and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario, 2016 ONSC 3821 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.), motion for leave to appeal dismissed December 12, 2016 (C.A. M46922)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3392 Affected party’s application dismissed on March 7, 2016 Accenture Inc. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) and Metrolinx, 2016 ONSC 1616 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.), motion for leave to appeal dismissed June 23, 2016 (C.A. M46285)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3322-I
PO-3231-I
PO-3402-F
Applicant’s application allowed on November 15, 2016 and remitted back to the IPC The Criminal Lawyers’ Association v. The Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services and Brian Beamish, Commissioner (Acting), Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2016 ONSC 6948 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court decision

PO-3074 &
PO-3132
Requester’s application dismissed on February 14,  2017 John R. Mann III v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Environment and the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Ontario, 2017 ONSC 1056 (CanLII), (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court decision