Judicial Review of Provincial Orders: Pg 3

Order No. Status Citation
PO-1810 Institution’s application allowed June 26, 2003

IPC’s appeal allowed by the Court of Appeal November 26, 2004

Institution’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed May 19, 2005

Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2004] O.J. No. 4813, 73 O.R. (3d) 321, 248 D.L.R. (4th) 57, 37 C.P.R. (4th) 193, Tor. Doc. C40867 (C.A.); reversing [2003] O.J. No. 2601, 65 O.R. (3d) 417, 228 D.L.R. (4th) 485, 173 O.A.C. 385, 3 Admin. L.R. (4th) 293, 26 C.P.R. (4th) 321, Tor. Docs. 519/00 and 520/2000 (Div. Ct.); leave to appeal refused, 2005 S.C.C.A. No. 95 (S.C.C.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
Supreme Court of Canada Decision

PO-1809 Institution’s application allowed June 26, 2003

IPC’s appeal allowed by the Court of Appeal November 26, 2004

Institution’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed May 19, 2005

Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2004] O.J. No. 4813, 73 O.R. (3d) 321, 248 D.L.R. (4th) 57, 37 C.P.R. (4th) 193, Tor. Doc. C40867 (C.A.); reversing [2003] O.J. No. 2601, 65 O.R. (3d) 417, 228 D.L.R. (4th) 485, 173 O.A.C. 385, 3 Admin. L.R. (4th) 293, 26 C.P.R. (4th) 321, Tor. Docs. 519/00 and 520/2000 (Div. Ct.); leave to appeal refused, 2005 S.C.C.A. No. 95 (S.C.C.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
Supreme Court of Canada Decision

PO-1805 Affected party’s application abandoned October 4, 2001 World Association of Nuclear Operators v. Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario and Martin Mittelstaedt and Ontario Power Generation Inc., Tor. Doc. 481/2000 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1797 Institution’s application abandoned December 5, 2002 Ministry of the Solicitor General v. Tom Mitchinson, Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner and John Doe, Requester, Tor. Doc. 471/2000 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1782 Institution’s application abandoned December 5, 2002 Ministry of the Solicitor General v. Laurel Cropley, Adjudicator and John Doe, Requester, Tor. Doc. 327/2000 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1779 Requester’s application dismissed March 25, 2004

Requester’s appeal allowed by the Court of Appeal May 25, 2007

Institution’s appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada allowed June 17, 2010

Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. Criminal Lawyers’ Association, 2010 SCC 23, reversing 2007 ONCA 32, which reversed (2004) 70 O.R. (3d) 332 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
Suprme Court of Canada decision

PO-1763 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court April 25, 2001 Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2001] O.J. No. 2552, Tor. Doc. 207/2000 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

PO-1759 Institution’s application abandoned November 28, 2003 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 210/2000 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
PO-1736 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court December 13, 2001

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal for Ontario denied March 21, 2002

Public Guardian and Trustee v. David Goodis, Senior Adjudicator and John Doe, Requester, Tor. Doc. 490/00 (Div. Ct.); motion for leave to appeal denied March 21, 2002, Tor. Doc. M28110 (C.A.)

Divisional Court Decision

PO-1721 Institution’s application dismissed December 5, 2002

Institution’s appeal allowed by Court of Appeal October 22, 2003

Ontario (Minister of Health and Long-Term Care v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2003] O.J. No. 4123, Tor. Doc. C39677 (C.A.), reversing [2002] O.J. No. 4769, 166 O.A.C. 183, Tor. Doc. 784/99 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision

PO-1718 Institution’s application abandoned December 4, 2002 Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. Holly Big Canoe, Adjudicator and Jane Doe, Requester, Toronto Doc. 697/99 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
PO-1709 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court November 14, 2000 Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Goodis, [2000] O.J. No. 4944, Toronto Doc. 684/99 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

PO-1706 Requester’s application dismissed by Divisional Court March 5, 2001 Grant v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2001] O.J. No. 749, 143 O.A.C. 131, Toronto Doc. 666/99 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

PO-1696 Institution’s application abandoned December 4, 2002 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 515/99 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
PO-1677 Application abandoned September 23, 1999 Ontario Federation of Justices of the Peace Associations v. Mitchinson et al,Tor. Doc. 355/99 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1678 Application abandoned September 23, 1999 Ontario Federation of Justices of the Peace Associations v. Mitchinson et al,Tor. Doc. 356/99 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1666 Application abandoned October 4, 1999 955104 Ontario Limited v. Laurel Cropley, Adjudicator et al, Tor. Doc. 299/99 (Div. Ct.)
PO-1664 Institution’s application allowed in part May 8, 2006 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Big Canoe, [2006] O.J. No. 1812, Toronto Doc. 257/99 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

PO-1658 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court March 20, 2000

Institution’s appeal allowed by Court of Appeal August 8, 2001

IPC’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed June 13, 2002

Solicitor General and Minister of Correctional Services v. Mitchinson, Toronto Doc. 209/99 (Div. Ct.)

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal granted June 29, 2000, Toronto Doc. M25700 (C.A.) Court of Appeal File No. C34561.

Ontario (Solicitor General) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner) (2001), 55 O.R. (3d) 355, 203 D.L.R. (4th) 538, O.J. No. 3223 (C.A.), reversing [2000] O.J. No. 1974 and Toronto Docs. 698/98 and 209/99 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (June 13, 2002), Doc. 28853 (S.C.C.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
S.C.C. Decision

P-1627 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court March 20, 2000

Institution’s appeal allowed by Court of Appeal August 8, 2001

IPC’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed June 13, 2002

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 698/98 (Div. Ct.)

Stay denied [1998] O.J. No. 5015 (Div. Ct.) (Q.L.)

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal granted June 29, 2000, Toronto Doc. M25697 (C.A.). Court of Appeal File No. C34563.

Ontario (Solicitor General) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner) (2001), 55 O.R. (3d) 355, 203 D.L.R. (4th) 538, O.J. No. 3223 (C.A.), reversing [2000] O.J. No. 1974 and Toronto Docs. 698/98 and 209/99 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (June 13, 2002), Doc. 28853 (S.C.C.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
S.C.C. Decision
Divisional Court Decision – Stay
Divisional Court Decision – Sealing

P-1618 Institution’s application dismissed by Divisional Court March 20, 2000

Institution’s appeal allowed by Court of Appeal August 8, 2001

IPC’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed June 13, 2002

Solicitor General and Minister of Correctional Services v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 681/98 (Div. Ct.)

Stay denied [1998] O.J. No. 5015 (Div. Ct.) (Q.L.)

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal granted June 29, 2000, Toronto Doc. M25699 (C.A.). Court of Appeal File No. C34562

Ontario (Solicitor General) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner) (2001), 55 O.R. (3d) 355, 203 D.L.R. (4th) 538, O.J. No. 3223 (C.A.), reversing [2000] O.J. No. 1974 and Toronto Docs. 698/98 and 209/99 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (June 13, 2002), Doc. 28853 (S.C.C.)

Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
S.C.C. Decision

Divisional Court Decision – Stay
Divisional court Decision – Sealing

P-1609 Affected parties’ application dismissed for delay January 16, 2001 Ottawa Valley Autistic Homes et al. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) et al., Toronto Doc. 484/99 (Div. Ct.)
P-1579 Requester’s application dismissed July 18, 2006 John Doe v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [2006] O.J. No. 2916, Toronto Doc. 458/98 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-1575 Application abandoned September 10, 1999 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 383/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Stay denied [1998] O.J. No. 5015 (Div. Ct.) (Q.L.)

Divisional Court Decision – Stay 

P-1568 Institution’s application dismissed February 26, 2003 Citation for Order P-1568:
Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 369/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)Citation for Reconsideration Order R-980023:
Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 42/99 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1564 Applications abandoned September 24, 1999 Ontario (Management Board Secretariat) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner, Toronto Doc. 330/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner,Toronto Doc. 331/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Sealing

P-1563 Applications abandoned September 24, 1999 Ontario (Management Board Secretariat) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner, Toronto Doc. 330/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner,Toronto Doc. 331/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Sealing

P-1561 Status for Order P-1561:
Order P-1561 rescinded. See judicial review of Reconsideration Order R-980036Status for Reconsideration Order R-980036:
Institution’s application allowed December 7, 2001Requester’s cross-application dismissed December 7, 2001IPC’s appeal dismissed by Court of Appeal November 29, 2002IPC’s application for leave to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada dismissed May 15, 2003
Citation for Order P-1561:
Attorney General of Ontario v. Holly Big Canoe, Inquiry Officer, and James Doe, Requester, Toronto Doc. 316/98 (Div. Ct.)Citation for Reconsideration Order R-980036:
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Big Canoe, [2002] O.J. No. 4596, 62 O.R. (3d) 167, 220 D.L.R. (4th) 467, Tor. Doc. C37981 (C.A.), affirming [2001] O.J. No. 4876, 208 D.L.R. (4th) 327 (Div. Ct.); application for leave to appeal dismissed [2003] S.C.C.A. No. 31, File No. 29572 (S.C.C.)Divisional Court Decision
Court of Appeal Decision
Supreme Court of Canada Decision
P-1551 Institution’s application abandoned May 1, 2000 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 252/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1550 Requester’s application abandoned July 22, 1998 Vincent v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Thunder Bay Doc. D19198 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1545 Application abandoned October 22, 1998 Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 195/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1538 Institution’s application abandoned August 11, 2000 Citation for Order P-1538:
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 199/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)Citation for Reconsideration Order R-980015:
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 39/98 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1514 Application abandoned March 9, 2000 Ontario (Solicitor General and Minister of Correctional Services) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 103/98 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Sealing

P-1510 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed June 2, 1998

IPC’s appeal dismissed by Ontario Court of Appeal October 22, 1999

Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner, Inquiry Officer) v. Ontario (Minister of Labour, Office of the Worker Advisor), [1999] O.J. No. 4560, 46 O.R. (3d) 395, 181 D.L.R. (4th) 603, 127 O.A.C. 173 (C.A.); affirming (June 2, 1998) Toronto Doc. 28/98 (Div. Ct.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-1482 Institution’s application abandoned September 25, 2000 Citation for Order P-1482:
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 868/97 (Ont. Div. Ct.)Citation for Reconsideration Order R-980012:
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 68/99 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1415 Application dismissed by Divisional Court July 5, 1999 Duncanson v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1999] O.J. No. 2464, 175 D.L.R. (4th) 340, 124 O.A.C. 170, 87 C.P.R. (3d) 94, Court File Nos. 284/97, 376/97, 410/97, 509/97 and 5/98 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-1406 Institution’s application abandoned July 15, 1998 Ontario (Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Native Affairs) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 529/97 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1398 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed February 6, 1998

IPC appeal allowed by Court of Appeal January 27, 1999

Ministry’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed January 20, 2000

Ontario (Minister of Finance) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1998] O.J. No. 420 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal granted [1998] O.J. No. 2261 (C.A.)

Appeal allowed [1999], 118 O.A.C. 108 (C.A.)

Leave to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada refused (January 20, 2000), Doc. 27191 (S.C.C.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision
Supreme Court of Canada Decision

P-1356 Application abandoned May 24, 2000 Tectonic Infrastructure Inc. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 259/97 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Sealing
Divisional Court Decision – Access

P-1342 Institution’s application dismissed September 8, 1997 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 179/97 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Divisional Court – Sealing
Divisional Court – Stay

P-1217 Abandoned November 16, 1998 Lycee Canadien en France v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 475/96 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1213 Requester’s application dismissed for delay July 28, 2005 John Doe v. Leroy Franklin, Charles Blazic, The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Ontario (Health Professions Appeal and Review Board) [formerly Ontario (Health Disciplines Board)], and Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Tor. Doc. 62/2001 (Div. Ct.)
P-1190 Institution’s application dismissed December 3, 1996

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal refused February 24, 1997

Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1996} O.J. No. 4636 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal refused [1997] O.J. No. 694 (C.A.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision
Divisional Court Decision – Strike

P-1124 Institution’s application abandoned March 19, 1997 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 160/96 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1114 Application abandoned October 20, 1998 Ontario (Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 120/96 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Stay

P-1027 Affected parties’ application allowed and IPC order quashed June 21, 1996 Adams v . Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1996] O.J. No. 2269, 136 D.L.R. (4th) 12, 91 O.A.C. 367, 69 C.P.R. (3d) 364 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-1019 Affected party’s application abandoned March 7, 1996 Ortech Corp. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 58/96 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-1018 Requester’s application abandoned September 12, 1996 Power Workers’ Union, C.U.P.E., Local 1000 v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 825/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-920 Institution’s application abandoned March 12, 1997 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 310/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-912 Institution’s application dismissed March 7, 1997

Affected person’s appeal dismissed by Ontario Court of Appeal September 28, 1999

Ontario (Criminal Code Review Board) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) (March 7, 1997), Toronto Doc. 283/95 (Div. Ct.); (1999) 47 O.R. (3d) 201 (C.A)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-898 Affected party’s application abandoned July 26, 1996 Standard Life Assurance Co. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 282/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-883 Institution’s application dismissed December 21, 1995

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal refused May 28,

Ontario (Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations) v. Fineberg, Toronto Doc. 220/95 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal refused [1996] O.J. No. 1838 (C.A.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-877 Institution’s and affected party’s applications abandoned July 16, 1996 Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 196/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

Richard Roe Inc. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 291/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)

P-809 Institution’s application abandoned April 21, 1995 Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 8/95 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-808 Institution’s application dismissed May 6, 1996

Institution’s motion for leave to appeal refused September 11, 1996

Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1996] O.J. No. 1669 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal refused [1996] O.J. No. 3114 (C.A.)

Court of Appeal Decision 
Divisional Court Decision

P-806 Institution’s applications dismissed June 19, 1995 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Docs. 1/95, 2/95 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-805 Institution’s applications dismissed June 19, 1995 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Docs. 1/95, 2/95 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-804 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed June 4, 1996

IPC’s motion for leave to appeal granted September 3, 1996

IPC’s appeal abandoned May 12, 1998

Ontario (Solicitor General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1996] O.J. No. 2218 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal granted [1996] O.J. No. 2963 (C.A.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-798 Affected party’s application abandoned October 23, 1995 St. Marys Cement Co. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner),Toronto Doc. 836/94 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision – Motion to Strike

P-792 Institution’s application abandoned September 4, 1996 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 777/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-788 Institution’s application abandoned November 29, 1996 Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 748/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-776 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed February 22, 1995 Ontario (Minister of Labour) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 692/94 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-771 Affected party’s application abandoned June 20, 1996

Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed April 14, 1997

Affected Party v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 710/94 (Div. Ct.)

Ontario (Minister of Finance) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1997] O.J. No. 1465, 102 O.A.C. 71, 46 Admin L.R. (2d) 115 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-736 Institution’s application abandoned December 19, 1994 Ontario (Minister of Community and Social Services) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 565/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-737 Institution’s application abandoned December 19, 1994 Ontario (Minister of Community and Social Services) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 565/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-728 Affected party’s application abandoned February 28, 1995 Art Gallery of Ontario v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner),Toronto Doc. 555/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-710 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed April 18, 1995 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Hale, [1995] O.J. No. 1143, 85 O.A.C. 229 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Divisional Court Decision – Access to Record

P-704 Institution’s application dismissed March 25, 1996

Institution’s and affected party’s appeals allowed and IPC order quashed June 19, 1997

Walmsley v. Ontario (Attorney General) (1996), 90 O.A.C. 181, [1996] O.J. No. 996 (Div. Ct.), reversed (1997), 34 O.R. (3d) 611, 101 O.A.C. 140, [1997] O.J. No. 2485 (C.A.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-689 Affected party’s application allowed and IPC order quashed May 17, 1996 Great Lakes Power Ltd. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner),Toronto Doc. 409/94 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Division Court Decision – Re: Motion to Strike

P-676 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed January 8, 1996 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fineberg, [1996] O.J. No. 67, 88 O.A.C. 318 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-658 Institution’s application abandoned December 23, 1994 The Attorney General of Ontario v. Anita Fineberg, Jane Doe and Mary Roe, Toronto Doc. 328/94 (Div. Ct.)
P-655 Affected party’s application abandoned May 16, 1994 Canadian Medical Laboratories Limited v. Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario, Tom Wright and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario (as Represented by the Minister of Health), Toronto Doc. 304/94 (Div. Ct.)
P-626 Institution’s application abandoned September 6, 1994 Ontario (Solicitor General and Minister of Correctional Services) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 178/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-623 Institution’s application dismissed June 24, 1994

Institution’s appeal dismissed May 8, 1995

Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Big Canoe, Toronto Doc. 111/94 (Div. Ct.), affirmed [1995] O.J. No. 1277 (C.A.)

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-616 Institution’s application abandoned May 1, 1995 Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 84/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-612 Institution’s application abandoned July 14, 1995 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 100/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-609 Affected party’s application abandoned October 17, 1994 Tonolli Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner),Toronto Doc. 79/94 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-590 Institution’s application allowed and matter sent back to IPC for further hearing June 24, 1994 (see IPC Order P-867) Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 846/93 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-555 Institution’s application abandoned November 22, 1993 Ontario Hydro v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 732/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-551 Institution’s application abandoned January 26, 1994 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 815/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-545 Affected party’s application dismissed June 27, 1996 Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 687/93 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Divisional Court Decision – Re: Add Respondent
Divisional Court Decision – Re: Sealing

P-534 Institution’s application allowed in part and matter sent back to IPC for further hearing June 16, 1994 (see IPC Order P-880)

Institution’s and requester’s motions for leave to appeal refused September 12, 1994

Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fineberg, [1994] O.J. No. 1419, 19 O.R. (3d) 197, 116 D.L.R. (4th) 498, 25 Admin. L.R. (2d) 123, 73 O.A.C. 311 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal refused Docs. M13824, M13829 (C.A.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-527 Institution’s application abandoned September 6, 1995 Ontario (Management Board of Cabinet) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 654/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-498 Institution’s application abandoned July 21, 1995 Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 497/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-496 Institution’s application abandoned September 6, 1994 Ontario (Securities Commission) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 495/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-494 Institution’s application abandoned May 10, 1995 Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 500/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-484 Institution’s application abandoned February 14, 1995 Ontario (Minister of Health) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 459/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-447 Institution’s application abandoned February 7, 1996 Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 339/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-435 Affected party’s application abandoned March 31, 1995 Canada (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 247/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.) Toronto Doc. 247/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-403 Institution’s application abandoned August 16, 1994 Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 103/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-400 Affected party’s application abandoned October 25, 1994 Ontario (Pork Producers’ Marketing Board) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 113/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-380 Institution’s application abandoned January 11, 1993 Ontario (Teachers’ Pension Plan Board) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 26/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-378 IPC’s application abandoned November 11, 1996 Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Ontario (Minister of Community and Social Services), Toronto Doc. 602/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-374 Institution’s application abandoned May 10, 1995 Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 500/93 (Ont. Div. Ct.)
P-373 Institution’s application allowed and IPC order quashed May 10, 1995

IPC’s appeal allowed September 3, 1998

Ontario (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1995] O.J. No. 1319, 23 O.R. (3d) 31, 125 D.L.R. (4th) 171, 32 Admin. L.R. (2d) 65, 85 O.A.C. 43, 61 C.P.R. (3d) 480 (Div. Ct.) reversed [1998] O.J. No. 3485, 164 D.L.R. (4th) 129, 112 O.A.C. 121, 41 O.R. (3d) 464

Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision

P-363 Institution’s application dismissed March 25, 1994 Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 721/92 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-359 Affected party’s application dismissed November 14, 1994 L & V Poultry Processing Ltd. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 743/92 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision
Divisional Court Decision – Re: Motion to Strike

P-352 Institution’s application dismissed May 6, 1993

Institution’s appeal allowed and IPC order quashed October 29, 1993

Requester’s motion for leave to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada refused June 2, 1994

Ontario (Solicitor General) v. Ontario (Assistant Information and Privacy Commissioner), [1993] O.J. No. 998, 102 D.L.R. (4th) 602, 12 Admin. L.R. (2d) 300, 64 O.A.C. 60 (Div. Ct.), reversed [1993] O.J. No. 2556, 107 D.L.R. (4th) 454, 18 Admin. L.R. (2d) 50, 68 O.A.C. 317 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1994), 112 D.L.R. (4th) viii (note), 20 Admin. L.R. 145 (note) 75 O.A.C. 160 (note), 176 N.R. 317 (note), [1993] S.C.C.A. No. 560 (note) (S.C.C.)
Court of Appeal Decision
Divisional Court Decision
Supreme Court of Canada Decision
P-345 Affected party’s application dismissed September 27, 1994

Affected party’s motion for leave to appeal refused December 23, 1994

Ontario Soft Drink Assn. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner),Toronto Doc. 587/92 (Div. Ct.), leave to appeal refused, Doc. M14464 (C.A.)

Divisional Court Decision

P-341 Affected party’s application dismissed March 8, 1994 General Accident Assurance Co. v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner), Toronto Doc. 557/92 (Div. Ct.)

Divisional Court Decision